Aristocracy may be viewed positively and negatively since it can be viewed as a pro to let the most educated individual in a nation make the most important decisions for that nation, but it can also be viewed negatively to allow a few people to make a crucial decision for an entire population. In today’s democratic society, the term aristocracy is often seen negatively since it frequently implies that a tiny, rich segment of the people controls the whole nation, resulting in disparities in individual rights.
Pros of Aristocracy
- Some of the advantages of aristocracy aid in its growth and development. These advantages or benefits are as follows: The systems procedure will be faster. There is less room for corruption. There is no single individual who rules.
- The system of governance attempts to place leadership in the hands of highly competent individuals, which is admirable.
- It prevents the establishment of a single tyrant by spreading authority among council members.
- The support of the ruling classes has resulted in the flourishing of arts and culture in previous aristocratic countries.
- The fewer the number of leaders participating, the more efficient the government becomes by lowering the likelihood of political deadlocks and conflicts.
- In an ideal world, well-intentioned aristocratic leaders can do what is beneficial for the country without being affected by popular opinion.
- In times of armed conflict, this type of administration is desirable since it results in a well-organized chain of command.
Cons of Aristocracy
- It is survival is essentially dependent on the exploitation of the masses.
- In aristocracies, the bulk of the people is barred from becoming governors.
- An aristocracy is the control of a few privileged classes that may or may not represent the views of the broader population because they are not permitted to vote.
- With an aristocracy real political power is concentrated in the hands of a few.
- The exploitation of the people is concealed and made less unpleasant via the employment of different methods and intrigues.
- It is very likely that factional feuds will erupt among leaders seeking ultimate authority as has happened in the past. Each fighting leader will eventually develop a competing clan of committed followers eager to do their leader’s bidding.
- There are no checks and balances in such a system, therefore leaders are not held accountable for their acts.
- Such a government may act selfishly in its own interests, such as creating an economic difference between the wealthy and poor and persecuting the masses in order to retain its own standing.
- The hereditary transfer of power in an aristocracy undermines merits, as the son of a renowned leader may not be similarly skilled. It may also put persons with questionable character in positions of authority which can have disastrous effects on the state.
Thank you for reading this article. If you have any queries regarding our article on the Pros and cons of Aristocracy then do comment in the comment section below.
Explore more information