Direct democracy is the pure form of governing structure in which all laws and policies imposed by governments are determined by people themselves, rather than by representatives who are elected by people. In addition, the direct democracy approach removes the intermediary and are rare in the today’s world. Some cantons in Switzerland follow this structure. This governmental structure has a number of benefits and drawbacks to consider. Let us check out the pros and cons of direct democracy in this article.
Pros of direct democracy:
- In a direct democracy, every citizen’s vote has equal weight.
- A direct democracy involves everyone. Thus, government control is always at the local level. In addition, government can not hide information from the people.
- Simply said, direct democracy would ask the people what they wanted to accomplish and then adopt measures to achieve those goals. Thus, there is more accountability in a direct democracy.
- Citizens are happier with the direct democracy. Administration functions to the pleasure of society when people live in direct democracy.
- Once the official is chosen to perform a specific job, then they will serve out their full term unless their behavior is illegal in most government arrangements. A community may recall anybody who does not behave in the best interests of everyone in an instant. This pros keeps everyone more honest.
- Everyone can express their point of view because each person has equitable stack when debating policies, laws. Thus, more cooperation occurs under this structure.
- Direct democracy is an exceptional cost-effective form of governing.
- Every individual is accountable for taking steps to improve their own quality of life.
- Direct democracy alters the purpose of the vote.
Cons of direct democracy:
- The cost of this type of democracy must be taken into consideration. In addition, if large country such as the USA implement this, then the cost of lost productivity would be enormous.
- The topics that are being debated are those that have a local influence.
- With a direct democracy, there is still the risk of vote manipulation to consider.
- Each voter must be properly educated about the issues on which they will vote.
- For direct democracy efforts to be effective, there must be a significant degree of involvement.
- Direct democracies are unable to make quick judgments.
- The majority is not required to defend the minority’s rights.
- In a direct democracy, the majority of decisions are made based on self-interest.
- In a direct democracy, there are concerns of oversight that must be addressed.
- Direct democracies are prone to high levels of instability.
Thank you for reading this article. If you have any queries regarding our article on the pros and cons of Direct Democracy then do comment in the comment section below.
Explore more information: